Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39255844›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

Adaptation to soil type contributes little to local adaptation in an Italian and a Swedish ecotype of

Thomas James Ellis, Jon Ågren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas James EllisPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, EBC, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8511-0254
Jon ÅgrenPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, EBC, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9573-2463

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural populations are subject to selection caused by a range of biotic and abiotic factors in their native habitats. Identifying these agents of selection and quantifying their effects is key to understanding how populations adapt to local conditions. We performed a factorial reciprocal-transplant experiment using locally adapted ecotypes of

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalArabidopsisEcotypeSoilClimateItalySelection, GeneticSwedenSoilArabidopsisedaphiclocal adaptationsoil

Identifiers

PMID39255844
PMCPMC11387056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.