SynthesisProceedings. Biological sciences2024
Easy to gain but hard to lose: the evolution of the knee sesamoid bones in Primates-a systematic review and phylogenetic meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Easy to gain but hard to lose: the evolution of the knee sesamoid bones in Primates-a systematic review and phylogenetic meta-analysis.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sesamoids are variably present skeletal elements found in tendons and ligaments near joints. Variability in sesamoid size, location and presence/absence is hypothesized to enable skeletal innovation, yet sesamoids are often ignored. Three knee sesamoids-the cyamella, medial fabella and lateral fabella-are present in primates, but we know little about how they evolved, if they are skeletal innovations, or why they are largely missing from Hominoidea. Our phylogenetic comparative analyses suggest that sesamoid presence/absence is highly phylogenetically structured and contains phylogenetic signal. Models suggest that it is easy to gain but difficult/impossible to lose knee sesamoids and that the fabellae may have similar developmental/evolutionary pathways that are distinct from the cyamella. Sesamoid presence/absence is uncorrelated to the mode of locomotion, suggesting that sesamoid biomechanical function may require information beyond sesamoid presence, such as size and location. Ancestral state reconstructions were largely uninformative but highlighted how reconstructions using parsimony can differ from those that are phylogenetically informed. Interestingly, there may be two ways to evolve fabellae, with humans evolving fabellae differently from most other primates. We hypothesize that the 're-emergence' of the lateral fabella in humans may be correlated with the evolution of a unique developmental pathway, potentially correlated with the evolution of straight-legged, bipedal locomotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.