ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2024
Anopheles jamesii Supports Plasmodium vivax Sporogony under Laboratory Conditions.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal epidemiology of indigenous and imported malaria cases in Goa, western India.Malaria journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anopheles jamesii, considered to be a non-malaria vector, is an abundant mosquito species found in coastal India and several countries in Asia. In Goa, western India, An. jamesii is the dominant anopheline species by numbers, and in recent epidemiological surveys, they have tested positive for Plasmodium carriage. To assess An. jamesii's capacity as a malaria vector, we carried out six controlled membrane feeding assays with the F1 generation of field-caught An. jamesii and Plasmodium vivax-infected patient blood samples. As a control, the established local vector, Anopheles stephensi, was fed in parallel to compare the oocyst and sporozoite loads. The average oocyst load of An. jamesii was 3.29, while for An. stephensi it was 10.23. Furthermore, An. jamesii's blood feeding rate (21.7% versus 85%), oocyst positivity rate (60% versus 90.6%), and sporozoite positivity (45.16% versus 83%) were significantly lower (P <0.05, unpaired t test) than those of An. stephensi, suggesting a recent adaptation to support Plasmodium sporogony.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.