ArticleCell reports methods2024
A broadly applicable method for quantifying cardiomyocyte cell division identifies proliferative events following myocardial infarction.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide association mapping and targeted loss of function studies identifyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Placental insufficiency disrupts cardiomyocyte ploidy and cell cycle fate in growth-restricted fetal sheep.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2026Article
- Molecular gatekeepers of endogenous adult mammalian cardiomyocyte proliferation.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Intronic RNAscope probes enable precise identification of cardiomyocyte nuclei and cell cycle activity.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Histone H2A.Z Deacetylation and Dedifferentiation in Infarcted/Tip60-depleted Cardiomyocytes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiomyocyte proliferation is a challenging metric to assess. Current methodologies have limitations in detecting the generation of new cardiomyocytes and technical challenges that reduce widespread applicability. Here, we describe an improved cell suspension and imaging-based methodology that can be broadly employed to assess cardiomyocyte cell division in standard laboratories across a multitude of model organisms and experimental conditions. We highlight additional metrics that can be gathered from the same cell preparations to enable additional relevant analyses to be performed. We incorporate additional antibody stains to address potential technical concerns of miscounting. Finally, we employ this methodology with a dual-thymidine analog-labeling approach to a post-infarction murine model, which allowed us to robustly identify unique cycling events, such as cardiomyocytes undergoing multiple rounds of cell division.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.