Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39255332›Full record

SynthesisEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Short- and long-term outcomes in isolated vs. hybrid thoracoscopic ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis.

Luca Aerts, Michal J Kawczynski, Elham Bidar, Justin G L Luermans, Sevasti-Maria Chaldoupi, Mark La Meir, Mariusz Kowalewski, Jos G Maessen, Samuel Heuts, Bart Maesen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Safety and Efficacy of Stand-Alone and Hybrid Thoracoscopic Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with concomitant cardiac surgery: a state-of-the-art review.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luca AertsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0360-1824
Michal J KawczynskiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2628-9562
Elham BidarDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9569-4900
Justin G L LuermansCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9598-2286
Sevasti-Maria ChaldoupiCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3938-6193
Mark La MeirDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-5110
Mariusz KowalewskiCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5478-3245
Jos G MaessenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Samuel HeutsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-9997
Bart MaesenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-1450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsBoth isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation techniques have demonstrated favourable outcomes in the management of patients with (long-standing) persistent AF, as compared with catheter ablation. However, it is currently unknown whether there is a difference in short- and long-term outcomes when comparing these two minimally invasive surgical AF ablation procedures. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate these two techniques, with a specific emphasis on long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs). METHODS AND

resultsA systematic search through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. All studies reporting on short-term outcomes were included in the meta-analysis. A pooled analysis of long-term freedom from ATA was performed based on Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve-derived individual patient data. Reconstructed individual time-to-event data were analysed in a multivariable Cox frailty model with adjustments for age, sex, type of AF, duration of AF history, and study variable (frailty term in the frailty Cox model). In total, 53 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 4950 patients. There were no differences in major short-term outcomes (mortality or stroke) between isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic ablation. A total of 18 studies reported KM curves for long-term freedom from ATA, comprising 2038 patients. Adjusted analysis revealed that hybrid ablation was significantly associated with greater freedom from ATA [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-0.83, P < 0.001] compared with isolated thoracoscopic ablation. Additionally, older age (aHR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, P = 0.002) and a higher percentage of male patients (aHR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower long-term freedom from ATA recurrence.

conclusionHybrid thoracoscopic AF ablation is associated with a greater long-term freedom from ATA when compared with isolated thoracoscopic ablation, without differences in complications.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationThoracoscopyFemaleHumansMaleRecurrenceRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAblationAtrial fibrillationHybrid ablationHybrid thoracoscopic ablationThoracoscopic ablation

Identifiers

PMID39255332
PMCPMC11448334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.