Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39255296›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Developing an ensemble machine learning study: Insights from a multi-center proof-of-concept study.

Annarita Fanizzi, Federico Fadda, Michele Maddalo, Sara Saponaro, Leda Lorenzon, Leonardo Ubaldi, Nicola Lambri, Alessia Giuliano, Emiliano Loi, Michele Signoriello and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Annarita FanizziLaboratorio Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori 'Giovanni Paolo II', Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2729-9896
Federico FaddaLaboratorio Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori 'Giovanni Paolo II', Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2807-4947
Michele MaddaloServizio di Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Sara SaponaroFisica Sanitaria, Azienda Usl Toscana Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy.
Leda LorenzonFisica Sanitaria, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Bolzano, Italy.
Leonardo UbaldiDip. Scienze Biomediche Sperimentali e Cliniche "Mario Serio", Università degli Studi di Firenze,Viale Morgagni, Firenze.
Nicola LambriIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Physics Unit of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, via Manzoni, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8706-6480
Alessia GiulianoU.O.C. Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Emiliano LoiSC Fisica Sanitaria, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Michele SignorielloFisica Sanitaria, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0770-4441
Marco BranchiniFisica Sanitaria, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale della Valtellina e dell'Alto Lario, Sondrio, Italy.
Gina BelmonteFisica Sanitaria, Azienda Usl Toscana Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy.
Marco GiannelliU.O.C. Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Pietro MancosuIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Physics Unit of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, via Manzoni, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia TalamontiDip. Scienze Biomediche Sperimentali e Cliniche "Mario Serio", Università degli Studi di Firenze,Viale Morgagni, Firenze.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-6451
Mauro IoriMedical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Sabina TangaroDipartimento di Fisica Applicata, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1372-3916
Michele AvanzoCentro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Via F. Gallini, Aviano, Italy.
Raffaella MassafraLaboratorio Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori 'Giovanni Paolo II', Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the numerous unmeet clinical needs, in recent years several Machine Learning models applied to medical images and clinical data have been introduced and developed. Even when they achieve encouraging results, they lack evolutionary progression, thus perpetuating their status as autonomous entities. We postulated that different algorithms which have been proposed in the literature to address the same diagnostic task, can be aggregated to enhance classification performance. We suggested a proof of concept to define an ensemble approach useful for integrating different algorithms proposed to solve the same clinical task.

methodsThe proposed approach was developed starting from a public database consisting of radiomic features extracted from CT images relating to 535 patients suffering from lung cancer. Seven algorithms were trained independently by participants in the AI4MP working group on Artificial Intelligence of the Italian Association of Physics in Medicine to discriminate metastatic from non-metastatic patients. The classification scores generated by these algorithms are used to train SVM classifier. The Explainable Artificial Intelligence approach is applied to the final model. The ensemble model was validated following an 80-20 hold-out and leave-one-out scheme on the training set.

resultsCompared to individual algorithms, a more accurate result was achieved. On the independent test the ensemble model achieved an accuracy of 0.78, a F1-score of 0.57 and a log-loss of 0.49. Shapley values representing the contribution of each algorithm to the final classification result of the ensemble model were calculated. This information represents an added value for the end user useful for evaluating the appropriateness of the classification result on a particular case. It also allows us to evaluate on a global level which methodological approaches of the individual algorithms are likely to have the most impact.

conclusionOur proposal represents an innovative approach useful for integrating different algorithms that populate the literature and which lays the foundations for future evaluations in broader application scenarios.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningProof of Concept StudyFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID39255296
PMCPMC11386419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.