ArticleeLife2024
Speech-induced suppression and vocal feedback sensitivity in human cortex.
Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parents' neural dynamics in response to their children's speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Natural auditory behaviors invoke cognitive brain networks.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Motor signals modulate cortical but not subcortical processing of self-initiated sounds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Individual differences in speech monitoring: Functional and structural correlates of delayed auditory feedback.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The effects of delayed auditory feedback depend on both the rhythm and content of the feedback signal.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- A streaming brain-to-voice neuroprosthesis to restore naturalistic communication.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Functional anatomy and topographical organization of the frontotemporal arcuate fasciculus.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal Mapping of Auditory Onsets during Speech Production.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Across the animal kingdom, neural responses in the auditory cortex are suppressed during vocalization, and humans are no exception. A common hypothesis is that suppression increases sensitivity to auditory feedback, enabling the detection of vocalization errors. This hypothesis has been previously confirmed in non-human primates, however a direct link between auditory suppression and sensitivity in human speech monitoring remains elusive. To address this issue, we obtained intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) recordings from 35 neurosurgical participants during speech production. We first characterized the detailed topography of auditory suppression, which varied across superior temporal gyrus (STG). Next, we performed a delayed auditory feedback (DAF) task to determine whether the suppressed sites were also sensitive to auditory feedback alterations. Indeed, overlapping sites showed enhanced responses to feedback, indicating sensitivity. Importantly, there was a strong correlation between the degree of auditory suppression and feedback sensitivity, suggesting suppression might be a key mechanism that underlies speech monitoring. Further, we found that when participants produced speech with simultaneous auditory feedback, posterior STG was selectively activated if participants were engaged in a DAF paradigm, suggesting that increased attentional load can modulate auditory feedback sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.