Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39254995›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Is in-kind kinder than cash? The impact of money vs. food aid on social emotions and aid take-up.

Samantha Kassirer, Ata Jami, Maryam Kouchaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Is in-kind kinder than cash? The impact of money vs. food aid on social emotions and aid take-up.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha KassirerKellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-157X
Ata JamiKellogg School of Management, Marketing Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0009-0007-0975-7498
Maryam KouchakiKellogg School of Management, Management and Organizations Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0003-1292-5134

Funding

Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been a shift in the way charities deliver humanitarian aid. Historically, the most prevalent way to help the global poor was by providing in-kind asset transfers. Recently, alternatives to in-kind aid, such as cash aid, have been increasing in prevalence. Although there has been widespread endorsement from the academic community and the public on the popularizing model of giving cash aid, one perspective remains untouched: the recipient's perspective. Thus, the present research explores how food-insecure individuals feel when receiving money vs. in-kind food aid to help meet their hunger and nutrition needs. Specifically, we explore the degree of positive (e.g., feeling cared for) and negative (e.g., feeling ashamed) social emotions felt when receiving the aid opportunity and how willing recipients are to accept monetary (vs. food) aid. Results from five preregistered experiments (

Indexed as

EmotionsFood AssistanceAdultAltruismCharitiesFemaleFood InsecurityHumansKenyaMaleUnited Statesfood aidfood insecuritymonetary aidrecipients’ reactions to aidrelational models theory

Identifiers

PMID39254995
PMCPMC11420210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.