ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Multi-modality MRI radiomics phenotypes in intermediate-high risk endometrial cancer: correlations with histopathology and prognosis.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Diffusion MRI in Cervical Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Cervical cancer in the modern era: cutting-edge strategies for diagnosis and treatment.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Prediction of cervical stromal invasion using ultrasound radiomics: from conventional ultrasound to intelligent diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics phenotypes of intermediate-to-high-risk endometrial cancers (ECs), explore their association with histopathologic features, and compare their prognostic ability with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage.
methodsThis study retrospectively recruited 355 patients with pathologically confirmed EC from 01/2016 to 06/2023. 166(46.8%) were classified as intermediate-to-high-risk ECs according to the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines. Radiomics clustering analysis was performed on preoperative MRI to identify the radiomics phenotype of intermediate-to-high-risk ECs. The association between the radiomics phenotypes and the clinicopathologic information was explored, and the added value in predicting the recurrence was also evaluated using concordance index (C-index).
resultsOf the included 166 patients (average age 56.83 ± 9.25 years), 23 were recurrent patients. The corresponding tumors in various clusters were assigned to phenotypes 1 and 2. Larger tumor diameter (P < .01), cervical mucosa invasion [30(36.15%) vs 15(18.07%), P = .01], deep myometrial infiltration [51(61.45%) vs 31(37.35%), P = .00], and histologic subtype [17(20.48%) vs 5(6.02%), P = .01] were associated with subtype 1. The risk of recurrence (P = .01) was higher in phenotype 1, and the FIGO stage could further differentiate higher recurrence risk in phenotype 1 (P < .01). The C-index was 0.66 for the radiomics phenotype model, 0.69 for the FIGO stage model, and 0.72 for the combined model.
conclusionsMRI-based radiomics consensus clustering enabled the identification of associations between radiomics features and histopathologic features in intermediate-to-high-risk EC. The FIGO stage could further elevate the prediction ability of recurrence risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39254904What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.