ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Cadaveric Insights into Pudendal Nerve Variations for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation: A Case Series.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pudendal nerve entrapment at the level of sacrospinous ligament or Alcock's canal; laparoscopic management.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2026Article
- Anatomical and Mechanical Safety of the Tissue Anchoring System (TAS®) for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Anatomical Variation of the Pudendal Nerve and Related Structures.European urology open science · 2026Review
- Cryoneurolysis: An Emerging Personalized Treatment Strategy for Significant Pelvic Pain.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Application of an Intestinal Spatula in Optimizing a Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe proximity of the pudendal nerve to the sacrospinous ligaments (SSLs) can lead to serious complications during sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF). This case series is aimed at providing an overview of the anatomy of the pudendal nerve, including insights from cadaver dissections and discussions on rare variations observed during these dissections.
methodsDissections were conducted on five female cadavers using a posterior gluteal approach on both sides. The course, morphometric features and variations in the branches of the pudendal nerve were assessed at the level of the SSL and within the pudendal canal.
resultsThe number of pudendal trunks cranial to the SSL ranged from one to three, with double trunks being the most common (70%). In 2 out of 10 (20%) sides inferior rectal nerves (IRNs) pierced through the SSL. In Case 1, IRNs pierced the SSL bilaterally before entering the pudendal canal and exiting at distances of 23.81 mm and 41.18 mm from the ischial spine on the right and left sides respectively. In Case 2, nerves with a width of 2.12 mm and 2.49 mm pierced the SSL and joined the IRN, piercing the SSL at 13.38 mm and 12.55 medial to the ischial spine and 16.80 mm and 19.32 mm lateral to the sacrum, on the left and right sides respectively. In 60% of cases, the IRN entered the pudendal canal, exiting at a median distance of 21.25 mm from the ischial spine.
conclusionsWe identified significant variations in the number of trunks and branching patterns of the pudendal nerve around the SSL and the course of the IRN caudal to the SSL. We documented IRNs or nerves joining the IRNs piercing the SSL. Identifying these variations is crucial for surgeons to minimize the risk of pudendal nerve injury during SSLF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39254843What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.