ArticleJournal of hematopathology2024
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms following curative treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia: incidence, correlation with therapeutic regimen, and future directions.
Article in Journal of hematopathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- IL-6 Upregulates CD73 in Human Placental Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Promote ATRA-Induced NB4 Cell Differentiation in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Cell deformability enhances adhesion of ATRA-differentiated HL-60 cells to P-selectin.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) have revolutionized the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), offering a cure rate of > 80%. Along with improved survival, the long-term consequences of anti-APL therapy are becoming increasingly apparent, including potential therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs). T-MNs are well known to arise after cytotoxic chemotherapy, but the leukemogenic potential of regimens utilizing only ATRA/ATO is not well established. The objective of this study is to examine the incidence, long-term risk, and clinicopathologic features of t-MNs arising after anti-APL therapy and how they correlates with the therapeutic regimen employed. We retrospectively collected treated APL patients between 01/2001 and 02/2021, categorized them into ATRA/ATO + chemo and ATRA/ATO groups based on the regimen used, and evaluated for the development of t-MN. A total of 110 APL patients were identified, including 67 (61%) treated with ATRA/ATO + chemo and 43 (39%) treated with ATRA/ATO only. Overall, 4/110 (3.6%) patients developed t-MNs, with all four emerging in the ATRA/ATO + chemo group. Ultimately, the incidence of t-MN in ATRA/ATO + chemo group was significantly higher compared with ATRA/ATO only group(5.97% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p = 0.0289). Our data spanning over two decades suggests that conventional chemotherapy for APL is associated with a small but significant risk of t-MN, whereas ATR/ATO does not carry this risk. This takes on new significance, considering several recent and ongoing trials have shown that a chemotherapy-free approach might become feasible for all risk APL types in the near future. Consequently, the omission of leukemogenic and arguably unnecessary chemotherapy from APL regimens may reduce the incidence of t-MNs in long-term survivors without sacrificing their cure rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39254828What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.