ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2025
Forward-striking technique in simple femoral shaft fractures: a comparative cohort study.
Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA persistent fracture gap following femoral nailing increases the risk of delayed and nonunion development. A forward-striking technique for reducing the gap in femoral nailing has been described, but its efficacy and therapeutic consequences have not been investigated in comparative studies. We provide the results of a comparative study that investigated the forward-striking technique's efficacy in terms of remaining fracture gaps and surgical outcomes.
methodsBetween 2017 and 2022, a retrospective cohort study was undertaken on 193 skeletal mature patients obtaining reamed femoral nailing for closed femoral shaft fractures. Comparisons of residual fracture gaps, timing to union, complications and re-operation rates were made between 80 patients (41.45%) undergoing femoral nailing with the forward striking procedure and 113 patients (58.55%) undergoing traditional nailing, accompanied by minimal 1-year follow-ups. In addition, the potential difference between fracture gaps before and after applying the forward striking procedure was compared.
resultsBoth groups had similar age, sex, presence of diabetes, smoking status, body mass index and time to surgery. However, the forward-striking group demonstrated significantly lower rates of postoperative complications, including delayed, nonunion, and the need for re-operation. Conversely, no significant differences were found in time to union (p = 0.222). The forward-striking procedure can significantly reduce residual fracture gaps from 3.99 to 1.66 mm (p < 0.001). No major complications in the forward-striking group including nonunion were observed.
conclusionThis study suggests that the forward-striking technique effectively reduces residual fracture gap during femoral nailing. The technique not only could be easily performed but is also reproducible. In addition, it can lower the risk of delayed union, nonunion and obviates the necessity for re-operation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39254827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.