ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2024
[(LV)EF is a poor predictor of sudden cardiac death : Pro/Contra].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sudden cardiac death in newly diagnosed non-ischaemic or ischaemic cardiomyopathy assessed with a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: the German nationwide SCD-PROTECT study.European heart journal · 2025Observational
- A review on wearable cardioverter-defibrillators in clinical practice for sudden cardiac death prevention and heart failure management.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For more than two decades the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been utilized with practically uncritical absolutism for the risk stratification of patients with ischemic and, historically, also nonischemic cardiomyopathy, in order to identify patients who could be threatened by sudden cardiac death. Based on historical data and in the absence of other better predictive parameters, the LVEF continues to appear in the guidelines unchanged, with cut-off values that lie in the region of the measurement accuracy of LVEF as determined by echocardiography. The basic identification of high-risk patients who then really benefit from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) must be re-evaluated under the aspect of a meaningfully altered interventional and pharmaceutical treatment of heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39254730What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.