ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2024
Oncogenic plasmid DNA and liver injury agent dictates liver cancer development in a mouse model.
Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The TUBA1B-G3BP2 Axis Sustains p65 Transcriptional Activity to Promote Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- TPM-like manipulations exerted an antidepressant effect and regulated amino acid metabolism and GHR/IGF-1 pathway in the liver in adolescent female CUMS rats.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary liver cancer is an increasing problem worldwide and is associated with significant mortality. A popular method of modeling liver cancer in mice is plasmid hydrodynamic tail vein injection (HTVI). However, plasmid-HTVI models rarely recapitulate the chronic liver injury which precedes the development of most human liver cancer. We sought to investigate how liver injury using thioacetamide contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of liver cancer in two oncogenic plasmid-HTVI-induced mouse liver cancer models. Fourteen-week-old male mice received double-oncogene plasmid-HTVI (SB/AKT/c-Met and SB/AKT/NRas) and then twice-weekly intraperitoneal injections of thioacetamide for 6 weeks. Liver tissue was examined for histopathological changes, including fibrosis and steatosis. Further characterization of fibrosis and inflammation was performed with immunostaining and real-time quantitative PCR. RNA sequencing with pathway analysis was used to explore novel pathways altered in the cancer models. Hepatocellular and cholangiocellular tumors were observed in mice injected with double-oncogene plasmid-HTVI models (SB/AKT/c-Met and SB/AKT/NRas). Thioacetamide induced mild fibrosis and increased alpha smooth muscle actin-expressing cells. However, the combination of plasmids and thioacetamide did not significantly increase tumor size, but increased multiplicity of small neoplastic lesions. Cancer and/or liver injury up-regulated profibrotic and proinflammatory genes while metabolic pathway genes were mostly down-regulated. We conclude that the liver injury microenvironment can interact with liver cancer and alter its presentation. However, the effects on cancer development vary depending on the genetic drivers with differing active oncogenic pathways. Therefore, the choice of plasmid-HTVI model and injury agent may influence the extent to which injury promotes liver cancer development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.