Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39254053›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2025

Green dreams are made of this: Futures consciousness and proenvironmental engagement.

Fanny Lalot, Sanna Ahvenharju, Outi Uusitalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fanny LalotFaculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1237-5585
Sanna AhvenharjuFinland Futures Research Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Outi UusitaloSchool of Business and Economics, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Funding

Jyväskylä University School of Business and EconomicsSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungStrategic Research Council (Academy of Finland) 345885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Futures consciousness (FC) refers to the capacity to understand, anticipate and prepare for the future. As a form of future orientation, it encompasses five interrelated dimensions of time perspective, agency beliefs, openness to alternatives, systems perception and concern for others. We present here cross-sectional evidence that FC is related to greater environmental engagement, above and beyond other future orientation constructs. In two pre-registered studies (one convenience student sample and one representative sample; N = 1041), we found that respondents with higher futures consciousness reported greater proenvironmental behaviour (consumption behaviour, land stewardship, social environmentalism and environmental citizenship). FC proved a better predictor of proenvironmental behaviour than the Zimbardo Inventory's Future Time Perspective and the Consideration for Future Consequences Scale (Study 1). FC was also related to stronger biospheric values (Study 2). However, it was not significantly related to personal environmental footprint (derived from a 16-item calculator). Strikingly, the environmental footprint was also unrelated to the Proenvironmental Behaviour Scale, which could point to a lack of correspondence between measures of proenvironmental propensity and impact. We discuss implications for future-thinking research and interventions aiming to improve futures consciousness.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessAdolescentAdultAgedConservation of Natural ResourcesCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmentFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultbiospheric valuescarbon footprintfuture orientationfutures consciousnessfuture thinkingproenvironmental behaviour

Identifiers

PMID39254053
PMCPMC11600491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.