SynthesisAfrican journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS2024
Efficacy of Adenoidectomy versus Tympanostomy on the Otitis Media with Effusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of tympanostomy tube insertion combined with adenoidectomy in children with recurrent otitis media: impact on effusion clearance time, otitis media recurrence rate, and hearing improvement.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the current evidence on the efficacy of tympanostomy and adenoidectomy in children with otitis media with effusion in comparison with tympanostomy alone following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe completed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies published in the literature with no date restrictions. We collected the results of the databases search and removed duplicated studies by Rayyan QCRI and EndNote Software X8. We used an Excel sheet for screening titles and abstracts, full text and data extraction. For quality assessment, we used Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 using the quality assessment table provided in Part 2 and Chapter 8.5, and quantitative data synthesis was done using Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.4.
resultsThe literature search showed 1510 studies, of which five studies were included in data synthesis. The study measured the effect through number of acute otitis media (AOM) episodes, cumulative number of AOM episodes, siblings with Otitis media (OM), hearing level hearing loss scale of the left, and right ears. The pooled effect estimates showed significant difference between tympanostomy with adenoidectomy versus tympanostomy alone in hearing level hearing loss scale of both ears (SMD -0.17, 95% CI [-0.29, -0.05], P -value=0.005). However, the pooled results were not heterogeneous ( P < 0.25, I2 = 24%).
conclusionsTympanostomy with adenoidectomy improves hearing compared to tympanostomy alone, but both treatments have similar effects on ear infection rates. Further research with larger samples is needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.