ArticleEndocrinology2024
Deletion of Nuclear Progesterone Receptors From Kisspeptin Cells Does Not Impair Negative Feedback in Female Mice.
Article in Endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arcuate nucleus-specific progesterone receptor knockdown in female mice is sufficient to induce PCOS-like hyperactivity in the reproductive axis.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Luteal-phase deficiency and diminished ovarian reserve: a narrative review of interactions and clinical implications.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of GnRH Pulse Generator Activity in Intact and Gonadectomized Male and Female Mice.Endocrinology · 2025Article
- Kisspeptin and neurokinin B: roles in reproductive health.Physiological reviews · 2025Review
- GnRH and Cognition.Endocrinology · 2025Review
- Reproductive aging in biological females: mechanisms and immediate consequences.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproductive function in mammals depends on the ability of progesterone (P4) to suppress pulsatile gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in a homeostatic-negative feedback loop. Previous research identified that cells upstream from GnRH neurons expressing the nuclear progesterone receptor (PGR) are required for P4-negative feedback. However, the identity of these cells and the mechanism by which they reduce GnRH/LH pulsatile secretion is unknown. We aimed to address the hypothesis that PGR expressed by a neural population in the arcuate nucleus recently identified as the GnRH pulse generator, cells expressing kisspeptin, neurokinin B, and dynorphin (KNDy cells), mediate P4-negative feedback. To achieve this, we used female mice with the PGR gene conditionally deleted from kisspeptin cells (KPRKO mice) and observed a substantial decrease in the percentage of KNDy neurons coexpressing PGR messenger RNA (mRNA) (11% in KPRKO mice vs 86% in wild-type [WT] mice). However, KPRKO mice did not display changes in the frequency or amplitude of LH pulses in diestrus or estrus, nor in the ability of exogenous P4 to blunt a postcastration increase in LH. Further, mRNA expression of arcuate kisspeptin and dynorphin, which are excitatory and inhibitory to GnRH secretion, respectively, remained unaltered in KPRKO mice compared to WT controls. Together, these findings show that the near-complete loss of PGR signaling from KNDy cells does not affect negative feedback regulation of GnRH pulse generation in mice, suggesting that feedback through this receptor can occur via a small number of KNDy cells or a yet unidentified cell population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.