Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253929›Full record

ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2026

Deciphering Mutational Impacts on c-Src-HK2 Interaction in Colorectal Cancer Progression, and Identification of Potential Phytocompounds Inhibitors: A Molecular Simulation and Free Energy Calculation Approach.

Muhammad Suleman, Faizullah, Abbas Khan, Abrar Mohammad Sayaf, Abdullah Alghamdi, Suad A Alghamdi, Mohammed Alissa, Amani Alghamdi, Sergio Crovella

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad SulemanLaboratory of Animal Research Center (LARC), Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
FaizullahCenter for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan.
Abbas KhanDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Abrar Mohammad SayafSchool of Chemical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia.
Abdullah AlghamdiDepartment of Medical Laboratory, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Suad A AlghamdiDepartment of Medical Laboratory, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlissaDepartment of Medical Laboratory, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Amani AlghamdiBiochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia.
Sergio CrovellaLaboratory of Animal Research Center (LARC), Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

Qatar University QUPD-CAS-23-24-491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) stands as the third most widespread cancer worldwide in both men and women, witnessing a concerning rise, especially in younger demographics. Abnormal activation of the Non-Receptor Tyrosine Kinase c-Src has been linked to the advancement of several human cancers, including colorectal, breast, lung, and pancreatic ones. The interaction between c-Src and Hexokinase 2 (HK2) triggers enzyme phosphorylation, significantly boosting glycolysis, and ultimately contributing to the development of CRC.

objectivesThe objectives of this study are to examine the influence of newly identified mutations on the interaction between c-Src and the HK2 enzyme and to discover potent phytocompounds capable of disrupting this interaction.

methodsIn this study, we utilized molecular docking to check the effect of the identified mutation on the binding of c-Src with HK2. Virtual drug screening, MD simulation, and binding free energy were employed to identify potent drugs against the binding interface of c-Src and HK2.

resultsAmong these mutations, six (W151C, L272P, A296S, A330D, R391H, and P434A) were observed to significantly disrupt the stability of the c-Src structure. Additionally, through molecular docking analysis, we demonstrated that the mutant forms of c-Src exhibited high binding affinities with HK2. The wildtype showed a docking score of -271.80 kcal/mol, while the mutants displayed scores of -280.77 kcal/mol, -369.01 kcal/mol, -324.41 kcal/mol, -362.18 kcal/mol, 266.77 kcal/mol, and -243.28 kcal/mol for W151C, L272P, A296S, A330D, R391H, and P434A respectively. Furthermore, we identified five lead phytocompounds showing strong potential to impede the binding of c-Src with HK2 enzyme, essential for colon cancer progression. These compounds exhibit robust bonding with c-Src with docking scores of -7.37 kcal/mol, -7.26 kcal/mol, -6.88 kcal/mol, -6.81 kcal/mol, and -6.73 kcal/mol. Moreover, these compounds demonstrate dynamic stability, structural compactness, and the lowest residual fluctuation during MD simulation. The binding free energies for the top five hits (-42.44±0.28 kcal/mol, -28.31±0.25 kcal/mol, -34.95±0.44 kcal/mol, -38.92±0.25 kcal/mol, and -30.34±0.27 kcal/mol), further affirm the strong interaction of these drugs with c-Src which might impede the cascade of events that drive the progression of colon cancer.

conclusionOur findings serve as a promising foundation, paving the way for future discoveries in the fight against colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseHexokinasePhytochemicalsProtein Kinase Inhibitorssrc-Family KinasesHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein BindingThermodynamicsCSK protein, humanCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseHexokinaseHK2 protein, humanPhytochemicalsProtein Kinase Inhibitorssrc-Family Kinasesbinding energy.colon cancerc-SrcHK2MD simulationmolecular docking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.