ArticleAnnals of medicine2024
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-derived pathophysiology and prognosis of diabetes mellitus with acute myocardial infarction after revascularization: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of stress hyperglycemia in in-hospital new-onset atrial fibrillation among patients with acute myocardial infarction: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Novel insights into myocardial fibrosis in patients with new onset ST-elevation myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention through enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about the underlying factors contributing to unfavourable clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) complicated by new-onset acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of DM on the pathophysiologic features and prognosis of patients with new-onset AMI following successful revascularization by utilizing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).
methodsConsecutive patients diagnosed with new-onset AMI between June 2022 and January 2024 were included. All patients underwent culprit vessel revascularization upon admission and CMR imaging 3-7 days later. The primary clinical endpoint of this study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), for which the average follow-up was 10 months.
resultsA total of 72 patients were divided into a DM group (
conclusionComprehensive phenotypic characterization of myocardial injury and microcirculatory status could enable reliable identification of high-risk MACCEs in DM patients with new-onset AMI following successful revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.