ArticleThe plant genome2025
Exploring genomic feature selection: A comparative analysis of GWAS and machine learning algorithms in a large-scale soybean dataset.
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary structure constrains genomic prediction accuracy more than model complexity in mango (Mangifera indica L.).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Association-Based Analysis of Verticillium Wilt Resistance in a Bi-Parental Hop (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification of biogeographically informative microssatelite markers for Brazilian Cannabis sativa samples: a machine learning approach for forensic origin prediction.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods and Prediction Models for Flowering Time Prediction in Maize.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Haplotype applications in genomic selection.Genome biology · 2026Review
- High-Resolution Genomic Resources for Trait Mapping and Precision Breeding for Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Article
- Exploring genomic feature selection: A comparative analysis of GWAS and machine learning algorithms in a large-scale soybean dataset.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The surge in high-throughput technologies has empowered the acquisition of vast genomic datasets, prompting the search for genetic markers and biomarkers relevant to complex traits. However, grappling with the inherent complexities of high dimensionality and sparsity within these datasets poses formidable hurdles. The immense number of features and their potential redundancy demand efficient strategies for extracting pertinent information and identifying significant markers. Feature selection is important in large genomic data as it helps in enhancing interpretability and computational efficiency. This study focuses on addressing these challenges through a comprehensive investigation into genomic feature selection methodologies, employing a rich soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) dataset comprising 966 lines with over 5.5 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Emphasizing the "small n large p" dilemma prevalent in contemporary genomic studies, we compared the efficacy of traditional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with two prominent machine learning tools, random forest and extreme gradient boosting, in pinpointing predictive features. Utilizing the expansive soybean dataset, we assessed the performance of these methodologies in selecting features that optimize predictive modeling for various phenotypes. By constructing predictive models based on the selected features, we ascertain the comparative prediction accuracies, thereby illuminating the strengths and limitations of these feature selection methodologies in the realm of genomic data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.