Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253773›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Exploring genomic feature selection: A comparative analysis of GWAS and machine learning algorithms in a large-scale soybean dataset.

Hawlader A Al-Mamun, Monica F Danilevicz, Jacob I Marsh, Cedric Gondro, David Edwards

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hawlader A Al-MamunCentre for Applied Bioinformatics, and School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2453-0914
Monica F DanileviczCentre for Applied Bioinformatics, and School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jacob I MarshDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Cedric GondroDepartment of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
David EdwardsCentre for Applied Bioinformatics, and School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7599-6760

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200100762Australian Research Council DP210100296National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2019-67015-29323National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-67015-33411National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-68014-39816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surge in high-throughput technologies has empowered the acquisition of vast genomic datasets, prompting the search for genetic markers and biomarkers relevant to complex traits. However, grappling with the inherent complexities of high dimensionality and sparsity within these datasets poses formidable hurdles. The immense number of features and their potential redundancy demand efficient strategies for extracting pertinent information and identifying significant markers. Feature selection is important in large genomic data as it helps in enhancing interpretability and computational efficiency. This study focuses on addressing these challenges through a comprehensive investigation into genomic feature selection methodologies, employing a rich soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) dataset comprising 966 lines with over 5.5 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Emphasizing the "small n large p" dilemma prevalent in contemporary genomic studies, we compared the efficacy of traditional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with two prominent machine learning tools, random forest and extreme gradient boosting, in pinpointing predictive features. Utilizing the expansive soybean dataset, we assessed the performance of these methodologies in selecting features that optimize predictive modeling for various phenotypes. By constructing predictive models based on the selected features, we ascertain the comparative prediction accuracies, thereby illuminating the strengths and limitations of these feature selection methodologies in the realm of genomic data analysis.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGlycine maxMachine LearningAlgorithmsGenomicsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID39253773
PMCPMC11726426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.