ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024
Safety and efficiency of a fully automatic workflow for auto-segmentation in radiotherapy using three commercially available deep learning-based applications.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicentre prospective risk analysis of a fully automated radiotherapy workflow.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Intraoperative thermostatic nursing and failure mode and effects analysis enhance gastrectomies' care quality.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in radiotherapy auto-segmentation necessitate reliable and efficient workflows. Therefore, a standardized fully automatic workflow was developed for three commercially available deep learning-based auto-segmentation applications and compared to a manual workflow for safety and efficiency. The workflow underwent safety evaluation with failure mode and effects analysis. Notably, eight failure modes were reduced, including seven with severity factors ≥7, indicating the effect on patients, and two with Risk Priority Number value >125, which assesses relative risk level. Efficiency, measured by mouse clicks, showed zero clicks with the automatic workflow. This automation illustrated improvement in both safety and efficiency of workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.