ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2024
A Case of Varus Collapse and Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty, after 12 Years of Primary Total Knee Replacement: Surgical Challenge and Bailout.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The failure of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) due to aseptic implant loosening is now the most common cause of long-term failure. Patients with varus alignment of the tibial or femoral component with additional bone collapse are a specific subset. It is unclear, however, whether implant fixation fails first or if bone collapse occurs first. Case Report: A 70-year-old lady with 12-year post-primary total knee arthroplasty presented with limping gate with radiological evidence of medial femoral bone collapse and implant loosening. After appropriate pre-operative planning, intraoperatively, after the removal of loose femoral implant which had additional bone loss and careful removal of a well-fixed tibial implant and to prevent collapse due to bone loss, Stryker LCCK implant with long stems on both sides was used. Additional screws on the medial femoral end, along with cement to fill the gap. After 5 years of follow-up, the patient is doing well with a painless full range of movement of the knee joint. Conclusion: Preoperatively one should always evaluate for bone loss and infection and compare with the other side. In case of aseptic collapse of bones, the use of thicker stems is a good way as these act as weight-sharing implants, and proper cementation during revision TKA is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.