Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253666›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2024

Bone Preservation in Femoral Intercondylar Box Cut - A Comparative Study between Older and Newer Generation Implants.

Haemanath Pandian, Nalli U Sanjeev Kumar, K V Arun Kumar, Nalli R Uvaraj, Mohideen Sheik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haemanath PandianDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nalli U Sanjeev KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
K V Arun KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nalli R UvarajDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mohideen SheikDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study was conducted to compare the quantity of intercondylar bone removed during femoral box osteotomy for implantation of three contemporary newer generation posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty designs Attune PS (DePuy), Anthem (Smith and Nephews), and NexGen Legacy (Zimmer) with the older version from the same manufacturers. Materials and Methods: We compared the maximum volumetric bone resection required for the housing of the PS mechanism of these six designs. Bone removal by each PS box cutting jig was three-dimensionally measured. The differences between the three designs were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for pairwise comparisons. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The newer generation implants save approximately 33% of bone that was resected from the box cut as compared to the older versions. DePuys Attune PS saved 27.1% bone as compared to Sigma PS resecting 6.96 cm3 of bone, and Zimmers Persona saved 40.57% bone as compared to NexGen from the intercondylar box cut resecting 6.18 cm3. Smith and Nephew s Anthem and Genesis have no difference in their box volume with both resecting 7.8 cm3 of bone. Conclusion: Irrespective of implant size, the Attune PS (DePuy) and Nexgen Legacy (Zimmer) cutting jigs always resected significantly less bone than did the jigs of older generations. There was no significant difference in the bone removed during femoral box osteotomy in the newer and older generations of Smith and Nephew.

Indexed as

Bone resectionbox osteotomycruciate substitutingnewer generation prosthesisposterior stabilizedtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39253666
PMCPMC11381052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.