Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253622›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2024

Proposal for a new study design and endpoint in research on medication history taking.

Theresa Terstegen, Marietta Kirchner, Walter E Haefeli, Hanna M Seidling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theresa TerstegenMedical Faculty Heidelberg/Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Internal Medicine IX, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marietta KirchnerMedical Faculty Heidelberg/Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Internal Medicine IX, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg, Germany.
Walter E HaefeliMedical Faculty Heidelberg/Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Internal Medicine IX, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hanna M SeidlingMedical Faculty Heidelberg/Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Internal Medicine IX, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-634X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medication history errors at hospital admission are common and effective strategies to improve the quality of medication histories are still being researched. However, studies on new approaches regarding medication history taking are often time-consuming and resource-intensive. The gold standard when evaluating the quality of medication histories is the comparison of a Discussion: We first identified shortcomings of the established study designs on medication history taking and subsequently defined requirements for a new design. A pragmatic study with an alternative endpoint was identified in a previous literature search. It served as the starting point from which we developed a new study design to assess the quality of approaches to medication history taking. Instead of taking a second medication history, a patient's pre-existing medication document can be used as comparator to determine the quality of the medication history. Furthermore, we defined a new primary endpoint, Conclusion: We propose a more resource-efficient study design with a new endpoint. We plan to test its feasibility and evaluate whether it could enhance the efficacy of research on medication history taking in a pilot project.

Indexed as

hospital admissionMedication history takingmedication therapy safetypharmaceutical researchstudy methodology

Identifiers

PMID39253622
PMCPMC11382705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.