ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024
Personalized nutrition: aligning science, regulation, and marketing.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Precision nutrition testing is the future of personalized care: evidence and coverage policies for equitable access.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Food Supplement Development: A Case Study in Glycemic Control.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Behavioral and human-computer interaction requirements for a candidate abdominal-sound-enabled dietary self-regulation system: a two-phase study in Taiwanese university students.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Dynamic Nutrient Profiling for Personalized Diet Planning: Meta-Analysis and PRISMA-Based Evidence Synthesis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Personalized Nutrition in Pediatric Chronic Diseases.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Aligning human and planetary health: towards tailored dietary advice for diverse citizen profiles.Transgenic research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in personalized nutrition among researchers and industry has grown rapidly in recent years and shows no signs of abating. In this paper, we discuss the growth of the personalized nutrition market, the evidence for the approach, and the regulatory landscape for personalized nutrition products. We found that regulatory gaps have led to market growth of products with unknown efficacy that are making bold, and possibly unsubstantiated, claims. As personalized nutrition products and related treatments continue to enter the market without regulation, unreliable products may cause consumers financial, psychological, and physical harm. Stronger regulation will help engender trust in these products among consumers and ensure their safety and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.