Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253560›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in ophthalmology2024

Large animal model species in pluripotent stem cell therapy research and development for retinal diseases: a systematic review.

Julia-Sophia Bellingrath, Kang V Li, Kanza Aziz, Jessica M Izzi, Ying V Liu, Mandeep S Singh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia-Sophia Bellingrath *Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kang V Li *Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Kanza AzizDepartment of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Jessica M IzziDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Ying V LiuWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Mandeep S SinghWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

Developing photoreceptor repair for macular degeneration therapy.R01EY033103 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SINGH, MANDEEP · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Retinal cell therapy modalities, in the category of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), are being developed to target several retinal diseases. Testing in large animal models (LAMs) is a crucial step in translating retinal ATMPs into clinical practice. However, challenges including budgetary and infrastructure constraints can hinder LAM research design and execution. Here, to facilitate the comparison of the various LAMs in pluripotent retinal cell therapy research, we aimed to systematically evaluate the species distribution, reported scientific utility, and methodology of a range of LAMs. Methods: A systematic search using the words retina, stem cell, transplantation, large animal, pig, rabbit, dog, and nonhuman primate was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Science Direct and GoogleScholar databases in February 2023. Results: We included 22 studies involving pluripotent stem cells (induced pluripotent stem cells or human embryonic stem cells) in LAMs, including non-human primates (NHP), pigs, dogs, and rabbits. Nearly half of the studies utilized wild-type animal models. In other studies, retinal degeneration features were simulated via laser, chemical, or genetic insult. Transplants were delivered subretinally, either as cell suspensions or pre-formed monolayers (with or without biodegradable scaffolding). The transplanted cells dose per eye varied widely (40,000 - 4,000,000 per dose). Cells were delivered via vitrectomy surgery in 15 studies and by an "ab externo" approach in one study. Structural outcomes were assessed using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging. Functional outcomes included multifocal electroretinogram and, in one case, a measure of visual acuity. Generally, cell suspension transplants exhibited low intraretinal incorporation, while monolayer transplants incorporated more efficiently. Immune responses posed challenges for allogeneic transplants, suggesting that autologous iPSC-derived transplants may be required to decrease the likelihood of rejection. Conclusion: The use of appropriate LAMs helps to advance the development of retinal ATMPs. The anatomical similarity of LAM and human eyes allows the implementation of clinically-relevant surgical techniques. While the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 has provided a framework to consider alternative methods including tissue-on-a-chip and human cell culture models for pharmacologic studies, LAM testing remains useful for cell and tissue replacement studies to inform the development of clinical trial protocols.

Indexed as

immunosuppressionpreclinical (in vivo) studiesretinal degenerationstem cell transplantationsurgery techniques

Identifiers

PMID39253560
PMCPMC11381226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.