ArticlePNAS nexus2024
Beyond monopole electrostatics in regulating conformations of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanism of the SepF N‑Terminal Conformational Switch in Ring Assembly and Membrane Anchoring.JACS Au · 2026Article
- A Sequence-Specific Theory for Charge-Regulating IDPs.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
- Mapping Charge Interactions in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Electrostatic Collapse of Intrinsically Disordered Acid-Rich Protein Is Sensitive to Counterion Valency.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Statistical Physics-Based Approaches to Model the Function and Complexation of Disordered Proteins.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conformations and dynamics of an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) depend on its composition of charged and uncharged amino acids, and their specific placement in the protein sequence. In general, the charge (positive or negative) on an amino acid residue in the protein is not a fixed quantity. Each of the ionizable groups can exist in an equilibrated distribution of fully ionized state (monopole) and an ion-pair (dipole) state formed between the ionizing group and its counterion from the background electrolyte solution. The dipole formation (counterion condensation) depends on the protein conformation, which in turn depends on the distribution of charges and dipoles on the molecule. Consequently, effective charges of ionizable groups in the IDP backbone may differ from their chemical charges in isolation-a phenomenon termed charge-regulation. Accounting for the inevitable dipolar interactions, that have so far been ignored, and using a self-consistent procedure, we present a theory of charge-regulation as a function of sequence, temperature, and ionic strength. The theory quantitatively agrees with both charge reduction and salt-dependent conformation data of Prothymosin-alpha and makes several testable predictions. We predict charged groups are less ionized in sequences where opposite charges are well mixed compared to sequences where they are strongly segregated. Emergence of dipolar interactions from charge-regulation allows spontaneous coexistence of two phases having different conformations and charge states, sensitively depending on the charge patterning. These findings highlight sequence dependent charge-regulation and its potential exploitation by biological regulators such as phosphorylation and mutations in controlling protein conformation and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.