Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253367›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of exercise science2024

The Effect of Resisted Sprint Training on Acceleration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Elizabeth K Aldrich, Katherine Sullivan, Jonathan E Wingo, Michael R Esco, James Leeper, Mark T Richardson, Lee J Winchester, Michael V Fedewa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of exercise science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth K AldrichDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Katherine SullivanDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Jonathan E WingoDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Michael R EscoDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
James LeeperDepartment of Community Medicine & Population Health, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Mark T RichardsonDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Lee J WinchesterDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Michael V FedewaDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resisted sprint (RS) training, such as sled or parachute towing, is commonly used for sprint training among field sport athletes. While RS training is frequently employed by athletes and coaches, there is little research on its benefits, especially compared to unresisted running (UR) training programs with similar training volumes. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of RS training on acceleration compared to UR training. Potential sources were limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English prior to June 12, 2022, and gathered from the EBSCOhost, PubMed, and Web of Science online databases identified using combinations of the following terms:

Indexed as

performancesledspeedTowing

Identifiers

PMID39253367
PMCPMC11382779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.