Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253360›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Brain state-dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor stroke rehabilitation: a proof of concept randomized controlled trial.

Wala Mahmoud, David Baur, Brigitte Zrenner, Arianna Brancaccio, Paolo Belardinelli, Ander Ramos-Murguialday, Christoph Zrenner, Ulf Ziemann

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05005780 (Stroke Therapy With Brain Oscillation Synchronized Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05005780 nacompletednot on this map

Stroke Therapy With Brain Oscillation Synchronized Stimulation: Randomized Controlled Pilot Study to Compare the Therapeutic Effectiveness of a Personalized EEG-triggered Repetitive High-frequency TMS Therapy Protocol With Standard Low-frequency TMS Therapy Protocol in Patients With Spastic Paresis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2019 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsStrokeArmsNegative peak triggered 100 Hz triplet burst TMS, 1 Hz rTMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wala Mahmoud *Institute for Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
David Baur *Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Brigitte ZrennerTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arianna BrancaccioCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
Paolo BelardinelliHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ander Ramos-MurguialdayInstitute for Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christoph ZrennerTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ulf ZiemannDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In healthy subjects, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) demonstrated plasticity effects contingent on electroencephalography (EEG)-derived excitability states, defined by the phase of the ongoing sensorimotor μ-oscillation. The therapeutic potential of brain state-dependent rTMS in the rehabilitation of upper limb motor impairment post-stroke remains unexplored. Objective: Proof-of-concept trial to assess the efficacy of rTMS, synchronized to the sensorimotor μ-oscillation, in improving motor impairment and reducing upper-limb spasticity in stroke patients. Methods: We conducted a parallel group, randomized double-blind controlled trial in 30 chronic stroke patients (clinical trial registration number: NCT05005780). The experimental intervention group received EEG-triggered rTMS of the ipsilesional M1 [1,200 pulses; 0.33 Hz; 100% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)], while the control group received low-frequency rTMS of the contralesional motor cortex (1,200 pulses; 1 Hz, 115% RMT), i.e., an established treatment protocol. Both groups received 12 rTMS sessions (20 min, 3× per week, 4 weeks) followed by 50 min of physiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was the change in upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA-UE) scores between baseline, immediately post-treatment and 3 months' follow-up. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in the primary outcome measure (FMA-UE) and the secondary outcome measures. This included the reduction in spasticity, measured objectively using the hand-held dynamometer, and enhanced motor function as measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the outcome measures. Conclusion: The application of brain state-dependent rTMS for rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients is feasible. This pilot study demonstrated that the brain oscillation-synchronized rTMS protocol produced beneficial effects on motor impairment, motor function and spasticity that were comparable to those observed with an established therapeutic rTMS protocol. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT05005780].

Indexed as

brain state-dependent stimulationmotor stroke rehabilitationrTMSsensorimotor μ-oscillationspasticity

Identifiers

PMID39253360
PMCPMC11381265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.