Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253335›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024

Frequency of cefiderocol heteroresistance among patients treated with cefiderocol for carbapenem-resistant

Ryan K Shields, Ava J Dorazio, Giusy Tiseo, Kevin M Squires, Alessandro Leonildi, Cesira Giordano, Ellen G Kline, Simona Barnini, Alina Iovleva, Marissa P Griffith and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drug-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Genetic basis of cefiderocol resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Turning the Tide Against Carbapenem-resistantOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. ComparativeJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ryan K ShieldsDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9794-5665
Ava J DorazioDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Giusy TiseoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Osperdaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-4933
Kevin M SquiresDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alessandro LeonildiMicrobiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Cesira GiordanoMicrobiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Ellen G KlineDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Simona BarniniMicrobiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Alina IovlevaDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3599-7221
Marissa P GriffithDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Daria Van TyneDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7284-0103
Yohei DoiDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9620-2525
Marco FalconeDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Osperdaliero Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-8796

Funding

Use of site-specific pharmacokinetics to optimize antibiotic combinations and prevent the emergence of resistance against CRER21AI151363 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHIELDS, RYAN K · 2021 to 2022
$431k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI151363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cefiderocol exhibits potent Methods: Baseline CRAb isolates were collected from 27 consecutive patients in the USA and Italy. Cefiderocol susceptibility was tested by broth microdilutions in triplicate. Heteroresistance was defined by population analysis profiling in duplicate. Resistance mechanisms and strain relatedness were evaluated through comparative genomic analysis. Results: Overall, 59% of infecting CRAb isolates were identified as cefiderocol-heteroresistant; rates were higher among isolates from Italy (79%) than the USA (38%). The median Charlson Comorbidity and SOFA scores were 4 and 5, respectively; 44% of patients had pneumonia, which was the most common infection type. Rates of 28-day clinical success and survival were 30% and 73%, respectively. By broth microdilution, cefiderocol MICs ≥1 mg/L were associated with higher failure rates than MICs ≤0.5 mg/L (81% versus 55%). Rates of clinical failure were numerically higher among patients infected by cefiderocol-heteroresistant compared with susceptible CRAb (81% versus 55%). Whole-genome sequencing identified a premature stop codon in the TonB Conclusions: This pilot study supports the hypothesis that cefiderocol treatment failure may be associated with higher MICs and/or the presence of heteroresistance. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Identifiers

PMID39253335
PMCPMC11382143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.