Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253206›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Ex-vivo investigation of probiotic bacterial adhesion to the intestinal mucus.

Thị-Thanh-Trúc Phùng, Sébastien Dupont, Laurent Beney, Sylvie Moundanga, Emmanuel Denimal, Phú-Hà Hồ, Thomas Karbowiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The therapeutic potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Vitro Analysis of Probiotic Properties Related to the Adaptation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thị-Thanh-Trúc PhùngUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, INRAe, UMR PAM 1517, 1 Esplanade Erasme, 21000, Dijon, France.
Sébastien DupontUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, INRAe, UMR PAM 1517, 1 Esplanade Erasme, 21000, Dijon, France.
Laurent BeneyUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, INRAe, UMR PAM 1517, 1 Esplanade Erasme, 21000, Dijon, France.
Sylvie MoundangaUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, INRAe, UMR PAM 1517, 1 Esplanade Erasme, 21000, Dijon, France.
Emmanuel DenimalUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, INRAe, UMR PAM 1517, 1 Esplanade Erasme, 21000, Dijon, France.
Phú-Hà HồHanoi University of Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Life Science, 1 Dai Co Viet Road, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Thomas KarbowiakUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Institut Agro, Université de Bourgogne, INRAe, UMR PAM 1517, 1 Esplanade Erasme, 21000, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has promoted considerable interest in the potential health benefits of the new generation of probiotics. Despite the abundance of probiotic supplements, their adhesion and thereby colonization in the intestinal tract of the host, a determining factor of probiotic efficacy, remains questionable. Indeed, the gastrointestinal tract, a multi-component and complex system, obscures the comprehensive understanding of the probiotic adhesion mechanism. This study aimed to investigate the adhesion capacity of probiotic bacteria using two ex-vivo approaches that were specifically developed to investigate the bacteria-mucus agglomeration and the viable adhesion to intestinal mucus. Five probiotic bacterial strains including

Indexed as

Bacterial adhesionEx-vivo approachGastrointestinal tractProbiotic efficiency

Identifiers

PMID39253206
PMCPMC11382035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.