Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253201›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Fake social media news and distorted campaign detection framework using sentiment analysis & machine learning.

Akashdeep Bhardwaj, Salil Bharany, SeongKi Kim

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akashdeep BhardwajSchool of Computer Science, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India.
Salil BharanyChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
SeongKi KimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social networking platforms have become one of the most engaging portals on the Internet, enabling global users to express views, share news and campaigns, or simply exchange information. Yet there is an increasing number of fake and spam profiles spreading and disseminating fake information. There have been several conscious attempts to determine and distinguish genuine news from fake campaigns, which spread malicious disinformation among social network users. Manual verification of the huge volume of posts and news disseminated via social media is not feasible and humanly impossible. To overcome the issue, this research presents a framework to use sentiment analysis based on emotions to investigate news, posts, and opinions on social media. The proposed model computes the sentiment score of content-based entities to detect fake or spam and detect Bot accounts. The authors also present an investigation of fake news campaigns and their impact using a machine learning algorithm with highly accurate results as compared to other similar methods. The results presented an accuracy of 99.68 %, which is significantly higher as compared to other methodologies delivering lower accuracy.

Indexed as

BotsDistorted campaignsFake newsSentiment analysisSocial media

Identifiers

PMID39253201
PMCPMC11382168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.