ArticleHeliyon2024
Few-shot learning to identify atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer based on transvaginal ultrasonic images.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using transfer learning approaches to predict RNA-Seq gene expression data for cancer classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: It is challenging to accurately distinguish atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrial cancer (EC) under routine transvaginal ultrasonic (TVU) detection. Our research aims to use the few-shot learning (FSL) method to identify non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (NAEH), AEH, and EC based on limited TVU images. Methods: The TVU images of pathologically confirmed NAEH, AEH, and EC patients (n = 33 per class) were split into the support set (SS, n = 3 per class) and the query set (QS, n = 30 per class). Next, we used dual pretrained ResNet50 V2 which pretrained on ImageNet first and then on extra collected TVU images to extract 1*64 eigenvectors from the TVU images in SS and QS. Then, the Euclidean distances were calculated between each TVU image in QS and nine TVU images of SS. Finally, the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm was used to diagnose the TVU images in QS. Results: The overall accuracy and macro precision of the proposed FSL model in QS were 0.878 and 0.882 respectively, superior to the automated machine learning models, traditional ResNet50 V2 model, junior sonographer, and senior sonographer. When identifying EC, the proposed FSL model achieved the highest precision of 0.964, the highest recall of 0.900, and the highest F1-score of 0.931. Conclusions: The proposed FSL model combining dual pretrained ResNet50 V2 eigenvectors extractor and KNN classifier presented well in identifying NAEH, AEH, and EC patients with limited TVU images, showing potential in the application of computer-aided disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.