ArticleHeliyon2024
Probing and nasolacrimal intubation outcomes in children over 18 Months of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical outcomes and the role of probe exit site in nasal endoscopy-guided interventions for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a cross-sectional study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- FGF10/IGSF3 Variants in Bony Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Genotype-Phenotype Study of Syndromic Versus Isolated Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Natural Course, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate how risk factors impact success rates of initial probing and nasolacrimal duct (NLD) tube intubation in children over 18 months of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). Methods: This cohort study included 98 CNLDO patients aged 18 months to 10 years who underwent NLD probing with stent insertion. We employed the multivariate frailty model as our final model to conceptually elaborate on our correlated eye data, with the primary outcome measure evaluating the success rates of probing and tube intubation. Factors such as age, probing complexity, tube type, prior surgeries, and passive smoking were considered in the evaluation. Results: The study involved 98 patients (54 males, 44 females) with a mean age of 41.46 months and an average follow-up of 98.37 days (95 % CI 87.65-109.1). Out of the 110 eyes that underwent surgery, 13 (11.8 %) experienced failure while 97 (88.2 %) were censored. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated significant differences in age category and probing (P-value = 0.03 and 0.006 respectively), but not tube type (P-value = 0.8). Multivariable analysis confirmed that older age and complex probing were associated with higher failure rates in CNLDO cases, with each monthly increase correlating to a two percent higher likelihood of intubation failure. Conclusions: Patient age and probing complexity influence CNLDO treatment, impacting surgical techniques and outcomes. Tube type, prior surgery, and passive smoking have no significant impact on treatment success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.