Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253106›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024

Biomarkers and patient-related factors associated with clinical outcomes in dupilumab-treated atopic dermatitis.

Makiko Kido-Nakahara, Daisuke Onozuka, Kenji Izuhara, Hidehisa Saeki, Satoshi Nunomura, Motoi Takenaka, Mai Matsumoto, Yoko Kataoka, Rai Fujimoto, Sakae Kaneko and 34 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Biomarkers for therapeutic response and adverse outcomes in atopic dermatitis: A systematic review.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Past, the Present, and the Future of Periostin in Allergy.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Innovations and Emerging Therapies in Atopic Dermatitis Part 1.Current treatment options in allergy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

44 authors.

Makiko Kido-NakaharaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Daisuke OnozukaDepartment of Oral Microbe Control, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Kenji IzuharaDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Hidehisa SaekiDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Satoshi NunomuraDivision of Medical Biochemistry, Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
Motoi TakenakaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Mai MatsumotoDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yoko KataokaDepartment of Dermatology, Osaka Habikino Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Rai FujimotoDepartment of Dermatology, Osaka Habikino Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Sakae KanekoDepartment of Dermatology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Eishin MoritaDepartment of Dermatology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
Akio TanakaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Michihiro HideDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tatsuro OkanoDepartment of Dermatology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomomitsu MiyagakiDepartment of Dermatology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Natsuko AokiDepartment of Dermatology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan.
Kimiko NakajimaDepartment of Dermatology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan.
Susumu IchiyamaDepartment of Dermatology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyoko TonomuraDepartment of Dermatology, Course of Integrated Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yukinobu NakagawaDepartment of Dermatology, Course of Integrated Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Risa Tamagawa-MineokaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji MasudaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuya TakeichiDepartment of Dermatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.
Masashi AkiyamaDepartment of Dermatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.
Yozo IshiujiDepartment of Dermatology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Michie KatsutaDepartment of Dermatology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki KinoshitaDepartment of Dermatology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Chiharu TateishiDepartment of Dermatology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Aya YamamotoDepartment of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Aichi, Japan.
Akimichi MoritaDepartment of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Aichi, Japan.
Haruna Matsuda-HiroseDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Oita, Japan.
Yutaka HatanoDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Hasama-machi, Oita, Japan.
Hiroshi KawasakiDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiji TaneseDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mamitaro OhtsukiDepartment of Dermatology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Koji KamiyaDepartment of Dermatology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Yudai KabataDivision of Dermatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Riichiro AbeDivision of Dermatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Hiroshi MitsuiDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Tatsuyoshi KawamuraDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Gaku TsujiDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masutaka FurueDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Norito KatohDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takeshi NakaharaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic eczematous skin disease with severe pruritus. Several new therapeutic agents for AD such as dupilumab, an anti-IL-4Rα antibody, have been developed in recent years. We need to predict which agent is the best choice for each patient, but this remains difficult. Objective: Our aim was to examine clinical background factors and baseline biomarkers that could predict the achievement of improved clinical outcomes in patients with AD treated with dupilumab. Methods: A multicenter, prospective observational study was conducted on 110 patients with AD. The Eczema Area and Severity Index was used as an objective assessment, and the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure and Numerical Rating Scale for Pruritus were used as patient-reported outcomes. In addition, some clinical background factors were evaluated. Results: The achievement of an absolute Eczema Area and Severity Index of 7 or less was negatively associated with current comorbidity of food allergy and baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. There were negative associations between achievement of a Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score of 7 or less and duration of severe AD and between achievement of an itching Numerical Rating Scale for Pruritus score of 1 or less and current comorbidity of allergic conjunctivitis or baseline serum periostin level. Furthermore, signal detection analysis showed that a baseline serum LDH level less than 328 U/L could potentially be used as a cutoff value for predicting the efficacy of dupilumab. Conclusion: Baseline biomarkers such as LDH and periostin and clinical background factors such as current comorbidity of food allergy and a long period of severe disease may be useful indicators when choosing dupilumab for systemic treatment for AD, as they can predict the efficacy of dupilumab.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisdupilumabEczema Area and Severity Indexlactate dehydrogenaseNumerical Rating Scale for PruritusPatient-Oriented Eczema Measureperiostin

Identifiers

PMID39253106
PMCPMC11381866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.