Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253105›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024

Fish and shellfish allergy: Presentation and management differences in the UK and US-analysis of 945 patients.

Alla Nakonechna, Ard van Bergen, Ariharan Anantharachagan, Dilani Arnold, Nicole Johnston, Kari Nadeau, Krzysztof Rutkowski, Sayantani B Sindher, Panida Sriaroon, Iason Thomas and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alla NakonechnaUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ard van BergenIndependent Scientific Advisor, Chester, United Kingdom.
Ariharan AnantharachaganDepartment of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Royal Preston Hospital Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom.
Dilani ArnoldClinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Nicole JohnstonThe University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Tex.
Kari NadeauDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.
Krzysztof RutkowskiDepartment of Adult Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Sayantani B SindherSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.
Panida SriaroonUniversity of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Fla.
Iason ThomasDepartment of Adult Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Pavaladurai VijayaduraiDepartment of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Royal Preston Hospital Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom.
Annette WagnerDepartment of Allergy, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Carla M DavisDivision of Immunology, Allergy, and Retrovirology, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Seafood allergy (SA), including allergy to shellfish (crustacean and mollusks) and fish, is among the 4 most common food allergies causing anaphylaxis, but there are limited data showing SA clinical management in different countries. Objective: We sought to characterize a large cohort of patients with fish and shellfish allergy and to facilitate standardization of future care for this increasingly common allergic disease. Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational, noninterventional study from 945 patients from 2015 to 2019 in 7 hospitals in the United States and the United Kingdom to evaluate SA. A chi-square test was used to detect differences in family history, medical history, and current symptoms between patients in 2 countries. Results: Underdiagnosed anaphylaxis in patients with SA was associated with underuse of epinephrine (adrenaline) autoinjectors in both countries. Oral food challenge was used only when skin or serologic test results were negative. Asthma and allergic rhinitis were more common in the US patients with SA, but eczema was more common in UK patients with SA ( Conclusions: In international multicenter cohorts of patients with fish and shellfish allergy, there are opportunities for improvement in management. Physician identification of anaphylaxis, use of diagnostic oral food challenges, and anaphylaxis treatment with epinephrine are areas with significant knowledge gaps in need of improvement in the United Kingdom and the United States. There is an opportunity for the development of unified, standardized diagnostic protocols for SA with distribution for allergists and trainees.

Indexed as

anaphylaxisepinephrine (adrenaline) autoinjectorsfish allergyfish specific IgEoral food challengeSeafood allergyshellfish allergyshellfish specific IgEtotal IgE

Identifiers

PMID39253105
PMCPMC11381858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.