Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39253025›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2024

Chronic pain after traumatic brain injury: a collaborative care approach.

Mary C Curran, Sylvia Lucas, Jesse R Fann, Jennifer M Zumsteg, Jeanne M Hoffman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03523923 (The Effectiveness of Collaborative Care Versus Usual Care for Pain After Traumatic Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03523923 nacompletednot on this map

The Effectiveness of Collaborative Care Versus Usual Care for Pain After Traumatic Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2018 to 2022Enrolled158ConditionsBrain Injuries, Traumatic, Chronic Pain, Post-Traumatic HeadacheArmsCollaborative Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary C CurranDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Sylvia LucasDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jesse R FannDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jennifer M ZumstegValley Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jeanne M HoffmanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

ACL HHS 90DPTB0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pain is common after traumatic brain injury (TBI), frequently limits daily activities, and is associated with negative outcomes such as decreased community participation. Despite the negative impact of chronic pain, few people with TBI receive effective treatment. This paper describes a collaborative care (CC) intervention, TBI Care, adapted specifically to treat chronic pain in people living with TBI, emphasizing expert clinician input, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques, and other non-pharmacological approaches for decreasing pain interference. Methods: 79 participants engaged in the CC intervention from two academic medical rehabilitation clinics with weekly assessments of pain intensity, interference, and medication use. Participant feedback on the intervention was gathered by interview with the care manager (CM) at the last treatment session and/or booster session. Provider feedback was gathered by a confidential survey post intervention. Results: Ninety percent of participants received at least 11 of the target 12 sessions with a care manager (CM), the majority occurring over the phone. Participants endorsed an average of 7 pain locations. All participants received pain education, skills in self-monitoring, goal setting/behavioral activation and relaxation training. Pain interference scores (impact on activity and enjoyment), tracked weekly by the CM, significantly decreased across sessions. 89% of participants received recommendations for CBT skills, 65% received referrals for additional treatments targeting pain interference, and 43% received care coordination. 75% of participants reported 6 or more medications/supplements at both the first and last session, with changes recommended primarily for headache treatment. Feedback from participants and providers was positive. Discussion: TBI Care, a novel patient-centered CC approach, was flexibly delivered, tailored to the needs of those living with TBI and chronic pain, with a high level of participant engagement, and satisfaction among participants and providers. This approach, prioritizing pain self-management strategies and other non-pharmacological approaches, along with optimizing pharmacological treatment, led to significant reductions in self-reported pain interference and intensity during the intervention. Using a CC model in TBI is feasible and successfully improved access to evidence-based treatments for chronic pain as well as outcomes for pain interference and intensity. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03523923.

Indexed as

chronic paincognitive behavioral therapycollaborative careinterventiontraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39253025
PMCPMC11381419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.