Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39252976›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Multi-omic analysis identifies metabolic biomarkers for the early detection of breast cancer and therapeutic response prediction.

Huajie Song, Xiaowei Tang, Miao Liu, Guangxi Wang, Yuyao Yuan, Ruifang Pang, Chenyi Wang, Juntuo Zhou, Yang Yang, Mengmeng Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Huajie SongDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Xiaowei TangDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Miao LiuBreast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Guangxi WangDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Yuyao YuanDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Ruifang PangInstitute of Precision Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, P.R. China.
Chenyi WangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Juntuo ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Yang YangBreast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Mengmeng ZhangBreast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Yan JinDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.
Kewei JiangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Shu WangBreast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Yuxin YinDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable blood-based tests for identifying early-stage breast cancer remain elusive. Employing single-cell transcriptomic sequencing analysis, we illustrate a close correlation between nucleotide metabolism in the breast cancer and activation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment, which shows distinctions between subtypes of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC, and is likely to impact cancer prognosis through the A2AR-Treg pathway. Combining machine learning with absolute quantitative metabolomics, we have established an effective approach to the early detection of breast cancer, utilizing a four-metabolite panel including inosine and uridine. This metabolomics study, involving 1111 participants, demonstrates high accuracy across the training, test, and independent validation cohorts. Inosine and uridine prove predictive of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with TNBC. This study deepens our understanding of nucleotide metabolism in breast cancer development and introduces a promising non-invasive method for early breast cancer detection and predicting NAC response in patients with TNBC.

Indexed as

CancerMachine learningMetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID39252976
PMCPMC11381768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.