ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Conditional generative adversarial network-assisted system for radiation-free evaluation of scoliosis using a single smartphone photograph: a model development and validation study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review on the application of new technology in the screening and diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- Millimeter-Wave Imaging for Idiopathic Scoliosis Screening: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in surgical care within low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of development, validation, and deployment.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Long-Term Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adulthood: Clinical Challenges and Progress During the Critical Period of Pregnancy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Large-area flat-panel detector versus conventional detector for full-spine digital radiography: a retrospective comparative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common spinal disorder in children, characterized by insidious onset and rapid progression, which can lead to severe consequences if not detected in a timely manner. Currently, the diagnosis of AIS primarily relies on X-ray imaging. However, due to limitations in healthcare access and concerns over radiation exposure, this diagnostic method cannot be widely adopted. Therefore, we have developed and validated a screening system using deep learning technology, capable of generating virtual X-ray images (VXI) from two-dimensional Red Green Blue (2D-RGB) images captured by a smartphone or camera to assist spine surgeons in the rapid, accurate, and non-invasive assessment of AIS. Methods: We included 2397 patients with AIS and 48 potential patients with AIS who visited four medical institutions in mainland China from June 11th 2014 to November 28th 2023. Participants data included standing full-spine X-ray images captured by radiology technicians and 2D-RGB images taken by spine surgeons using a camera. We developed a deep learning model based on conditional generative adversarial networks (cGAN) called Swin-pix2pix to generate VXI on retrospective training (n = 1842) and validation (n = 100) dataset, then validated the performance of VXI in quantifying the curve type and severity of AIS on retrospective internal (n = 100), external (n = 135), and prospective test datasets (n = 268). The prospective test dataset included 268 participants treated in Nanjing, China, from April 19th, 2023, to November 28th, 2023, comprising 220 patients with AIS and 48 potential patients with AIS. Their data underwent strict quality control to ensure optimal data quality and consistency. Findings: Our Swin-pix2pix model generated realistic VXI, with the mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting the main and secondary Cobb angles of AIS significantly lower than other baseline cGAN models, at 3.2° and 3.1° on prospective test dataset. The diagnostic accuracy for scoliosis severity grading exceeded that of two spine surgery experts, with accuracy of 0.93 (95% CI [0.91, 0.95]) in main curve and 0.89 (95% CI [0.87, 0.91]) in secondary curve. For main curve position and curve classification, the predictive accuracy of the Swin-pix2pix model also surpassed that of the baseline cGAN models, with accuracy of 0.93 (95% CI [0.90, 0.95]) for thoracic curve and 0.97 (95% CI [0.96, 0.98]), achieving satisfactory results on three external datasets as well. Interpretation: Our developed Swin-pix2pix model holds promise for using a single photo taken with a smartphone or camera to rapidly assess AIS curve type and severity without radiation, enabling large-scale screening. However, limited data quality and quantity, a homogeneous participant population, and rotational errors during imaging may affect the applicability and accuracy of the system, requiring further improvement in the future. Funding: National Key R&D Program of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Nanjing Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program, and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Centre of Orthopedic Surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.