ArticleUrology case reports2024
Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) migration into the bladder with bladder stone formation: Case report.
Article in Urology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The wandering intrauterine contraceptive device: An unusual case of omental IUCD migration with multimodality imaging findings.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Intravesical migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device complicated by giant bladder calculus formation: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Intrauterine device migration into the bladder with urolithiasis: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Perforated IUD as Atypical Cause of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection: A Case Report.Case reports in urology · 2025Article
- Intrauterine device (IUD) migration completely into the abdominal cavity and half into the bladder to form a stone: a case report and mini-review.BMC urology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) is commonly used to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Migration of IUCD into the bladder is a rare complication. We present a case of a 38-year-old woman with a history of IUCD insertion 05 years ago, immediately following her last delivery. She had a history of unplanned pregnancy 05 months following the IUCD insertion. She also complained of lower urinary tract storage symptoms. Clinical examination revealed suprapubic tenderness. Non-contrast abdomino-pelvic CT scan and cystoscopy confirmed the presence of an IUCD in the bladder with an attached stone. Open Cystotomy was performed, successfully removing the bladder stone with the intravesical IUCD. The patient was discharged without complications and reported symptom resolution during follow-up. IUCD migration into the bladder is a rare but clinically significant complication. There should be a high index of suspicion of migration in a patient with unexpected pregnancy associated with urinary complaint following IUCD insertion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.