Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39252825›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024

Multiparameter phenotyping of platelets and characterization of the effects of agonists using machine learning.

Ami Vadgama, James Boot, Nicola Dark, Harriet E Allan, Charles A Mein, Paul C Armstrong, Timothy D Warner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ami VadgamaCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
James BootGenome Centre, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicola DarkCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Harriet E AllanCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Charles A MeinGenome Centre, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul C ArmstrongCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Timothy D WarnerCentre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Platelet function is driven by the expression of specialized surface markers. The concept of distinct circulating subpopulations of platelets has emerged in recent years, but their exact nature remains debatable. Objectives: To design a spectral flow cytometry-based phenotyping workflow to provide a more comprehensive characterization, at a global and individual level, of surface markers in resting and activated healthy platelets, and to apply this workflow to investigate how responses differ according to platelet age. Methods: A 14-marker flow cytometry panel was developed and applied to vehicle- or agonist-stimulated platelet-rich plasma and whole blood samples obtained from healthy volunteers, or to platelets sorted according to SYTO-13 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) staining intensity as an indicator of platelet age. Data were analyzed using both user-led and independent approaches incorporating novel machine learning-based algorithms. Results: The assay detected differences in marker expression in healthy platelets, at rest and on agonist activation, in both platelet-rich plasma and whole blood samples, that are consistent with the literature. Machine learning identified stimulated populations of platelets with high accuracy (>80%). Similarly, machine learning differentiation between young and old platelet populations achieved 76% accuracy, primarily weighted by forward scatter, cluster of differentiation (CD) 41, side scatter, glycoprotein VI, CD61, and CD42b expression patterns. Conclusion: Our approach provides a powerful phenotypic assay coupled with robust bioinformatic and machine learning workflows for deep analysis of platelet subpopulations. Cleavable receptors, glycoprotein VI and CD42b, contribute to defining shared and unique subpopulations. This adoptable, low-volume approach will be valuable in deep characterization of platelets in disease.

Indexed as

computational biologyflow cytometryhemostasismachine learningthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID39252825
PMCPMC11381873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.