ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Effect of compressive force combined with vibration on CCL2 and CCL5 in human periodontal ligament cells.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arrayed Magnetic Accelerator Synergistically Enhances Orthodontic Tooth Movement via Microtubule Assembly-Mediated Periodontal Remodeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of compressive force combined with vibration on expression of CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and 5 (CCL5) in human periodontal ligament (hPDL) cells. Methods: Human PDL cells were cultured and assigned into four groups: control (Con), compressive force 2.0 g/cm Results: At 24 h and 48 h, CCL2 mRNA and protein levels in C and VC were significantly higher than Con. At 24 h, VC showed significantly higher CCL2 mRNA expression than C. However, there was no significant difference between CCL2 protein in C and VC at both time points. At 24 h and 48 h, CCL5 mRNA expression was significantly down-regulated in V and VC, whereas CCL5 protein was undetectable in all groups. Conclusions: Application of compressive force combined with vibration resulted in the upregulation of CCL2 mRNA and protein levels, whereas CCL5 mRNA expression was down-regulated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.