ArticleData in brief2024
Dataset of 313 metagenome-assemble genomes from streamer hot spring water.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community succession and functional trait reorganization in a continuous aerobic denitrification reactor under repeated hydraulic retention time reductions.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Article
- Dataset of 313 metagenome-assemble genomes from streamer hot spring water.Data in brief · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This data report presents prokaryotic metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from a hot spring stream with temperatures between 64 and 100°C. The stream water was filtered and the extracted total DNA was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Approximately 80 Gb of raw data were generated, which were subsequently assembled using MEGAHIT v1.2.9. The MAGs were generated using MetaWRAP with binning approaches of MetaBAT2, CONCOCT and MaxBin2. We constructed 25 medium-quality and 24 high-quality archaeal MAGs, and 152 medium-quality and 112 high-quality bacterial MAGs. The fasta files of these MAGs are available in the NCBI database as well as Mendeley Data. Major phyla identified include Bacteroidota, Chloroflexota, Desulfobacterota, Firmicutes, Patescibacteria, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetota, Verrucomicrobiota, Armatimonadota, Nitrospirota, Acidobacteriota, Elusimicrobiota, Planctomycetota, Candidate division WOR-3, Aquificota, Thermoproteota, and Micrarchaeota. This dataset is valuable for studies on thermophilic genomes, reconstruction of biochemical pathways and gene discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.