Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39252781›Full record

ArticleData in brief2024

Datasets on the production routes and the properties of plant powders for manufacturing of green products.

Claire Mayer-Laigle, Johnny Beaugrand, Alain Bourmaud, Lena Brionne, Thibault Colinart, Stephane Dervaux, Charlène Fabre, Marie-Joo le Guen, Kolja Konschak, Gabriel Paës and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Claire Mayer-LaigleIATE, University of Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier SupAgro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Johnny BeaugrandINRAE, UR BIA 1268, 44316 Nantes, France.
Alain BourmaudUniversité Bretagne Sud, CNRS, IRDL, UMR 6027, Lorient, France.
Lena BrionneINRAE, UR BIA 1268, 44316 Nantes, France.
Thibault ColinartUniversité Bretagne Sud, CNRS, IRDL, UMR 6027, Lorient, France.
Stephane DervauxMIA, Université Paris Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, France.
Charlène FabreIATE, University of Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier SupAgro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Marie-Joo le GuenScion, 49 Sala Street, Rotorua 3010, New Zealand.
Kolja KonschakUniversité Bretagne Sud, CNRS, IRDL, UMR 6027, Lorient, France.
Gabriel PaësUniversité de Reims Champagne Ardenne, INRAE, FARE, UMR A 614, Reims, France.
Cécile SottoIATE, University of Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier SupAgro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Magalie WeberINRAE, UR BIA 1268, 44316 Nantes, France.
Patrice BucheIATE, University of Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier SupAgro, 34060 Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of the plant biomass available on earth makes plants an exceptional resource for replacing fossil resources in green chemistry, bioenergy and biobased materials. For numerous applications, and especially the high-tech ones (building block molecules, high-power bioenergy, additive manufacturing of biobased materials), the macrostructure assemblies of the plant biomass often need to be first broken down into a fine powder. This can be achieved by dry fractionation process combining comminution and sorting steps. The chemical and physical properties of the ground plant powder results both from the process conditions, the histological structure and chemical composition of the raw plant materials. In a forward engineering approach, the quality of the final products can be highly improved by the selection of the right powder (raw materials and production process) for the right application. This article provides production routes together with physical and chemical characterization of 10 biomass powders from 6 different biomass feedstocks (SP - spirulina, HI - hibiscus, PB - pine bark, HC - hemp Core, RH - rice husk and RHA - rice husk ash). These feedstocks represent a broad range of raw materials properties. For pine bark, hemp core, rice husk and rice husk ash, two grades of powders related to two different particle sizes were produced by two different routes to highlight the impact of the comminution process on the powder properties. The devices used and the process parameters are described. The morphological properties of the powder were quantified using laser diffraction (particle size) and image analysis (shape factor) and qualitatively analyzed with SEM. The specific surface area was determined using gas sorption with BET theory, and the hygroscopic properties were measured using direct vapor sorption. The chemical characterizations were determined with a set of biochemical assays and, complementary, FTIR and fluorescence spectra were recorded to provide fingerprints of samples. The dataset includes tables that summarize the main characteristic descriptors of each analysis as well as the raw data. The data are registered in the French Research Data Gouv public repository and also stored in the PO2 BaGaTel database using the PO2/TransformON ontology [1]. SPO2Q web tool allows on line querying of the database, which can also be consulted using PO2 manager desktop application [[1], [2], [3]].

Indexed as

Biochemical compositionDirect sorption measurementFine comminutionFluorescence spectroscopyFTIR spectroscopyLignocelluloseMorphological propertiesThermogravimetric analysis

Identifiers

PMID39252781
PMCPMC11382005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.