ArticleData in brief2024
Balinese story texts dataset for narrative text analyses.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Annotated data for semantic role labeling of crisis events in Indonesian Tweets.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Balinese text-to-speech dataset as digital cultural heritage.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Balinese story texts dataset for narrative text analyses.Data in brief · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automatic narrative text analysis is gaining traction as artificial intelligence-based computational linguistic tools such as named entity recognition systems and natural language processing (NLP) toolkits become more prevalent. Character identification is the first stage in narrative text analysis; however, it is difficult due to the diversity of appearances and distinctive characteristics among regions. Further challenging analyses, such as role classification, emotion and personality profiling, and character network development, require successful character identification initially, which is crucial. Because there are so many annotated English datasets, computational linguistic tools are mostly focused on English literature. However, there are restricted tools for analyzing Balinese story texts because of a scarcity of low-resource language datasets. The study presents the first annotated Balinese story texts dataset for narrative text analyses, consisting of four sub-datasets for character identification, alias clustering (named entity linking, alias resolution), and character classification. The dataset is a compilation of 120 manually annotated Balinese stories from books and public websites, spanning multiple genres such as folk tales, fairy tales, fables, and mythology. Two Balinese native speakers, including an expert in sociolinguistics and macrolinguistics, annotated the dataset using predetermined guidelines set by an expert. The inter-annotator agreement (IAA) score is calculated using Cohen's Kappa Coefficient, Jaccard Similarity Coefficient, Mean F1-score to measure the level of agreement between annotators and dataset consistency and its reliability. The first subdataset consists of 89,917 annotated words with five labels referring to the Balinese-character named entities. Each character entity's appearance in 6,634 sentences is further annotated in the second subdataset. These two sub-datasets can be used for character identification purposes at the word and sentence level. The list of character groups which are groups of various aliases for each character entity has been annotated in the third subdataset for alias clustering purposes. The third subdataset contains 930-character groups from 120 story texts with each story text containing an average of 7-to-8-character groups. In the fourth subdataset, 848-character groups-of the 930-character groups in the third subdataset-have been categorized as protagonists and antagonists. The protagonists (66.16 %) make up most character groups, with the antagonists (33.84 %) making up the rest of the groups. The fourth subdataset can be used for computing-based classification of characters into two roles between protagonist and antagonist. These datasets have the potential to improve research in narrative text analyses, especially in the areas of computational linguistic tools and advanced machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models in low resource languages. It can also be used for further research including character network development, character relationship extraction, and character classification beyond protagonist and antagonist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.