ArticleCureus2024
Surgical Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type II odontoid fracture, classified by Anderson and D'Alonzo, is the most common traumatic injury to the odontoid process. Surgical management of this lesion is particularly challenging in underresourced countries. This study aims to report the preliminary experience of the Kinshasa University Teaching Hospital in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, particularly using adaptive techniques. Three patients, aged 22, 30, and 32 years, respectively, were admitted to the neurosurgery department with Anderson and D'Alonzo type II odontoid fractures as confirmed by CT scan imaging. The first two patients underwent anterior odontoid fixation using a non-cannulated orthopaedic screw with an image intensifier. In the third case, partial resection of the C1 posterior arch was performed, followed by immobilisation using a rigid Philadelphia neck brace. Postoperative follow-up in all three cases was uneventful, and neurological outcomes were satisfactory. Odontoid surgery remains challenging for developing countries. The use of a non-cannulated orthopaedic screw for anterior fixation and posterior spinal cord decompression via partial resection of the C1 posterior arch, followed by external cervical immobilisation with a rigid neck brace for neglected fractures, could be effective alternatives to conventional surgical techniques. However, randomised multicentre studies are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of these techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.