ArticleCureus2024
Application of the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) in Ultrasound Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approach to abnormal uterine bleeding in presence of endometrial polyps with new hysteroscopic devices.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Correlation of clinical and histopathological findings in abnormal uterine bleeding.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAbnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) affects a significant proportion of women, particularly around the ages of menarche and menopause. While ultrasonography is a primary diagnostic tool for AUB, techniques like the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) scoring system have enhanced diagnostic accuracy for endometrial abnormalities. IETA provides a standardized approach to evaluating endometrial features, which aids in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions.
methodsThis study applied the IETA scoring system to the ultrasound evaluation of 50 women presenting with AUB. The study assessed various endometrial characteristics, including thickness, echogenicity, midline appearance, junction regularity, and vascular patterns. Data were analyzed to correlate IETA scores with histopathological findings and to compare the ultrasound features of benign and malignant lesions.
resultsThe study found that non-uniform endometrial characteristics and irregular midline appearances were more common in malignant lesions. Specifically, interrupted or irregular endometrial-myometrial junctions, absence of the bright edge, higher color scores, and complex vascular patterns were significantly associated with malignancy. Mean endometrial thickness was notably higher in malignant cases compared to benign ones, with a statistically significant difference. The most frequent IETA scores were 7, 12, and 13.
conclusionIntegrating the IETA scoring system into ultrasound evaluation enhances the detection of endometrial abnormalities, improving the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. This approach provides a reliable framework for diagnosing and managing AUB, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures and facilitating better clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.