ArticleCureus2024
Characterising Skin Electrical Impedance Using Tape Stripping Methods: A Bioelectrical Study of a Porcine Model.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Recent advancements in ultra-low power electronics and wireless devices have facilitated the widespread adoption of wearable technology for fitness and health monitoring, paving the way for personalized medicine. Microneedle-based devices, comprising small epidermal patches that penetrate the skin's stratum corneum to potentially access biomarkers in the extracellular fluid of the viable epidermis, represent a promising innovation in this field. Objectives This project aimed to develop and validate a novel method to evaluate microneedle engagement in the skin in real-time. To our knowledge, there are no studies published to date that have characterized the electrical impedance of stratum corneum and epidermis using the tape stripping method to selectively remove cell layers. Additionally, no studies have been published comparing the electrical impedance of fresh to frozen-thawed porcine skin. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel method to evaluate microneedle engagement in skin, in real-time, that does not require processing of the tissue. Methods A tape stripping technique was employed to selectively remove the stratum corneum from fresh and frozen-thawed porcine skin samples which were then electrically characterized using an excitation frequency of 5 kHz with a peak Voltage of 1 V. Results This study demonstrated a mean impedance reduction of 97.08 ± 1.3 % for fresh porcine skin, and 98.04 ± 0.3 % for frozen-thawed porcine skin when transitioning from the surface stratum corneum to the viable epidermis. The correlation between the reduction of impedance and the number of tape strips across all 18 test sites was significant (r = 0.98, p < 0.00001). However, comparing the skin impedance of the fresh and frozen-thawed specimens showed poor equivalence, with the frozen-thawed sites approximately 5.5 times the impedance of the fresh sites before any tape stripping, and 4.19 times greater after 30 tape strips. Conclusions These findings suggest that monitoring for an interelectrode impedance decrease of greater than 95% between two projections of a microneedle device could provide a rapid and effective evaluation of skin engagement, crucial for advancing the development and clinical application of microneedle-based technologies in personalized medicine. The study also underscores the impact of the freeze-thaw process on the mechanical and electrical properties of skin, which is crucial for standardizing testing protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.