ArticleCureus2024
Prognostic Equations and Accuracy of a Total Score of Functional Independence Measure at Discharge for Different Diseases in a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The interplay between stroke and hip fractures: a narrative review of mechanisms, risk assessment, and prevention.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPrognosis and goal setting from admission in the convalescent rehabilitation ward, supported by a multidisciplinary team, enhance rehabilitation and discharge support. Predicting functional independence measure (FIM) outcomes can further optimize these processes. This study aimed to develop prognostic equations for the motor FIM at discharge for stroke, hip fracture (HF), vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which are common diseases in patients admitted to convalescent rehabilitation wards, using multiple regression analysis, and to clarify the difference in the accuracy of the predicted motor FIM according to the disease.
methodsThis study included 965 patients admitted to our hospital. The objective variable consists of the motor FIM at discharge, and the explanatory variables were age, sex, days from onset to admission, total admission motor FIM, and total admission cognitive FIM. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed. The analysis of the difference in the accuracy of predicted motor FIM by disease used the absolute value of the residuals.
resultsThe total motor FIM and cognitive FIM at admission were extracted for all four diseases included in this study. The absolute value of the residuals appeared to be more accurate for TKA, HF, stroke, and VCF in that order.
conclusionsAlthough differences in the accuracy of the prediction equation were observed by disease, this prediction equation can be used as an approach to review the details of rehabilitation and discharge and can be tailored to each case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.