ArticleCureus2024
Relationship of C-reactive Protein/Serum Albumin Ratio and qPitt Bacteremia Score With An All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Bloodstream Infections.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutrophil-Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio and Monocyte-to-Albumin Ratio: Utility of the Combined Biomarkers in the Prediction of 30-Day Mortality in Male Diabetes Patients Over 80 Years Old with Bloodstream Infections.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Prognostic Significance of CRP/Albumin, D-Dimer/Albumin, D-Dimer/Fibrinogen Ratios and Triglyceride-Glucose Index in Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever: A Prospective Observational Study.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Risk Factors and Clinical Impact of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBloodstream infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite notable advances in their diagnosis and treatment. C-reactive protein/serum albumin ratio and the quick Pitt bacteremia score are two useful tools for clinicians to assess severity and predict mortality risk in patients with sepsis attributable to bloodstream infections. This study examined the relationship between C-reactive protein/serum albumin ratio and Q Pitt bacteremia score with all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with bloodstream infections.
methodsHospitalized adult patients with bacteremic bloodstream infections between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics and clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from patient electronic records. C-reactive protein/albumin ratio was calculated using CRP (mg/L) and serum albumin (g/L) values obtained within 24 hours of blood culture collection and quick Pitt bacteremia score was calculated for each patient with each of the five variables of the score determined within 24 hours of blood culture collection and each patient was assigned a numerical score of 0-5 accordingly. The relationship between C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and quick Pitt bacteremia score with all-cause in-hospital mortality was determined.
resultsA total of 187 hospitalized adult patients with non-repeat bacteremic bloodstream infections were identified.
conclusionIn hospitalized patients with bacteremic bloodstream infections, an incremental increase in quick Pitt bacteremia score and mean C-reactive protein/albumin ratio of >8 was associated with higher mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.